§ Guide, full text

Completing The Disclosure Review Document A Technical And Legal Guide

The Disclosure Review Document is a crucial component of UK e-disclosure, requiring input from the client, e-discovery specialist, and forensic examiner. This guide provides a field-by-field breakdown, addresses common mistakes, and offers practical advice for its joint completion and negotiation.

21 pages · 28 min read

Loading the PDF reader

Page 1

THE DISCLOSURE REVIEW DOCUMENT · A GUIDE FOR UK LAWYERS Completing the Disclosure Review Document A Technical and Legal Guide COMPUTER FORENSICS LAB DISCOVERY. UK

§ ABOUT THE AUTHOR PREPARED BY COMPUTER FORENSICS LAB E-DISCOVERY TEAM FULL CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION

§ CONTENTS In this guide 01 Executive summary 02 The problem in plain English: an exam you sit jointly 03 Anatomy of the DRD 04 What to learn from the client 05 What to learn from your e Discovery specialist 06 What to learn from your forensic examiner 07 Field by field: who supplies which answer 08 Drafting Section 1 well 09 Joint completion and negotiation 10 The timetable, mapped to the learning 11 Worked example: a Section 2 built from evidence 12 Common mistakes and technical limitations 13 Questions to ask · Suggested wording 14 Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic expert 15 Frequently asked questions 16 Glossary · References · Disclaimer · How a specialist laboratory can assist

§ 01 · ORIENTATION Executive summary THE HEADLINE POINT: THE DRD IS COMPLETED FROM THREE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE, NONE OF THEM THE DRAFTING LAWYER

§ 02 · FIRST PRINCIPLES The problem in plain English: an exam you sit jointly

§ 03 · THE DOCUMENT Anatomy of the DRD FOR THE PRACTITIONER

Page 2

§ 04 · SOURCE ON E What to learn from the client

§ 05 · SOURCE TWO What to learn from your e Discovery specialist

§ 06 · SOURCE THREE What to learn from your forensic examiner WHYTHISCONSULTISCHEAPINSURANCE

§ 07 · THEMAP Field by field: who supplies which answer DRD TERRITORY WHO SUPPLIES IT THE EVIDENCE BEHIND THE ENTRY

§ 08 · THE LEGAL HALF Drafting Section 1 well

§ 09 · ACROSS THE TABLE Joint completion and negotiation

Page 3

§ 10 · THECLOCK The timetable, mapped to the learning DEADLINE LEARNING THAT MUST ALREADY BE DONE

§ 11 · IN THE WILD Worked example: a Section 2 built from evidence THE ENTRIES, AND WHAT STOOD BEHIND THEM

§ 12 · WHEREITGOESWRONG Common mistakes and technical limitations Common mistakes Technical limitations

§ 13 · INTERROGATORIES & DRAFTING AIDS Questions to ask · Suggested wording Ask your client (before drafting) Ask your opponent Ask your e Discovery / forensic provider SUGGESTED WORDING · INSTRUCTIONTOAPR OV IDERFORTHEDRDSUPPORT PAC K

§ 14 · QUICK CONTROL Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic expert The DRD completion checklist Red flags When to involve a digital forensic expert

§ 15 · COMMON QUESTIONS Frequently asked questions Who actually completes the DRD? How much detail does Section 2 really need? What if we genuinely do not know a figure yet? The other side's Section 2 is vague. What do we do? Can the DRD be changed after the CMC? Does the DRD bind us at the certificate stage?

Page 4

§ 16 · REFERENCE Glossary Sources and authoritative references DISCLAIMER

§ HOW A SPECIALIST LABORATORY CAN ASSIST Working with Computer Forensics Lab Speak to a forensic examiner, not a salesperson. INSTRUCTTHELAB NEWENQUIRIESEMAILE - DISCOVERY

Cite as: Joseph Naghdi, Completing The Disclosure Review Document A Technical And Legal Guide, Computer Forensics Lab, https://e-discovery.uk/library/completing-the-disclosure-review-document-a-technical-and-legal-guide/pdf.

Instruct the practice

Bring us in early. Defensibility is built, not retrofitted.

Whether you are responding to a regulator, preparing for disclosure, or scoping an internal investigation, start the chain of custody with a short, confidential conversation.

WhatsApp