Android Acquisition Logical File System And Physical
17 pages · 25 min read
- Forensic collection and imaging
- Mobile and messaging evidence
Guide · 17 pages · 25 min read · Published 2026-09-02
Read this guide on your phone, browse guides by topic or go back to the full PDF library.
17 pages · 25 min read
Published by Computer Forensics Lab on 2026-09-02. Original material of the practice, free to read, cite and download. The authority behind this subject is ACPO/NPCC Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence, which you should read alongside this guide. See every guide's author and source.
Prefer a PDF that matches this page exactly? Download the current text as a PDF, generated from the wording shown here, including any later corrections.
Three Depths of Extraction, and Why the Method Chosen Decides What the
12 Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic expert
14 Glossary · References · Disclaimer · How a specialist laboratory can assist
The headline point: on Android the acquisition method decides the evidence, a logical extraction takes only
what the device hands over, a file-system extraction reaches the storage and app databases including deleted
not degree, so the depth must be asked about for every device and every report.
The problem in plain English: the method decides the evidence
Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic
expert
What is the difference between logical, file-system and physical extraction?
Why does the acquisition method matter so much for the evidence?
The other side's report says nothing was found. Should we accept that?
Speak to a forensic examiner, not a salesperson.
10 pages · 14 min read
A complete guide to how Computer Forensics Lab handles electronic evidence for UK litigation, internal investigations and regulatory work.
6 pages · 8 min read
A capability overview written for US counsel who need evidence that sits in the United Kingdom handled properly, then delivered into the review workflow their firm already runs.
Whether you are responding to a regulator, preparing for disclosure, or scoping an internal investigation, start the chain of custody with a short, confidential conversation.