§ Guide

RAID NAS And Server Recovery

This guide, 'RAID, NAS and Server Recovery', is prepared by Computer Forensics Lab for UK lawyers, in-house counsel, and investigators.

Ref · E-D · 2026 · §LIBClass · ConfidentialJuris · England & WalesStatus · Active

Guide · 18 pages · 26 min read · Published 2026-08-31

This guide, 'RAID, NAS and Server Recovery', is prepared by Computer Forensics Lab for UK lawyers, in-house counsel, and investigators. It addresses the complexities of reconstructing arrays, network storage, and servers without losing evidence. The guide covers how RAID, NAS, and servers store data, the process of reconstructing an array, and recovery from failed or degraded arrays. It also discusses preserving live server storage, deployment considerations like disclosure and spoliation, and where else evidence might live within source architecture. Practical sections include common mistakes, technical limitations, questions to ask, and a checklist of red flags, advising when to involve a digital forensic expert for array or server recovery.

Read this guide on your phone, browse guides by topic or go back to the full PDF library.

§ Credit and source

Published by Computer Forensics Lab on 2026-08-31. Original material of the practice, free to read, cite and download. See every guide's author and source.

§ Full text of RAID NAS And Server Recovery

Download the PDF

Prefer a PDF that matches this page exactly? Download the current text as a PDF, generated from the wording shown here, including any later corrections.

Page 1

ARRAY & SERVER RECOVERY · A GUIDE FOR UK LAWYERS RAID, NAS and Server Recovery Reconstructing Arrays, Network Storage and Servers Without Losing the Evidence COMPUTER FORENSICS LAB

§ ABOUT THE AUTHOR PREPARED BY COMPUTER FORENSICS LAB E-DISCOVERY TEAM NAS & VIRTUALISATION RECOVERY CPR PART 35 EXPERT REPORT S FULL CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION

§ CONTENTS In this guide 01 Executive summary 02 The problem in plain English: the data is not on any one disk 03 How RAID, NAS and servers store data 04 Reconstructing an array: geometry, parity and forensic imaging 05 Failed and degraded arrays: recovery from partial sets 06 Preserving live server storage: snapshots, shares and proportionality 07 Deployment: disclosure, spoliation and the mishandled rebuild 08 Source architecture: where else the evidence lives 09 Worked examples 10 Common mistakes and technical limitations 11 Questions to ask · Suggested wording 12 Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic expert 13 Frequently asked questions 14 Glossary · References · Disclaimer · How a specialist laboratory can assist

§ 01 · ORIENTATION Executive summary only when the array's geometry is correctly reconstructed, and the commonest way to lose it is a well-meant

§ 02 · FIRST PRINCIPLES The problem in plain English: the data is not on any one disk

§ 03 · HOWITSTORESDATA How RAID, NAS and servers store data MEMBERS GEOMETRY ARRAY FILE SYSTEM EVIDENCE

Page 2

§ 04 · RECONSTRUCTION Reconstructing an array: geometry, parity and forensic imaging

§ 05 · FAILEDANDDEGRADEDARRAYS Failed and degraded arrays: recovery from partial sets

§ 06 · PRESERVINGLIVESERVERSTORAGE Preserving live server storage: snapshots, shares and proportionality

§ 07 · DEPLOYMENT Deployment: disclosure, spoliation and the mishandled rebuild

§ 08 · THEWIDERMAP Source architecture: where else the evidence lives EVIDENCE ARRAY / (SYNCED/ COUNTERPARTS THE END POINT S SERVER CACHED) BACKUPS & CLOUD DELETED / REPLICAS PLATFORMS RECOVERABLE

§ 09 · IN THE WILD Worked examples EXAMPLE1 · THEHELPFULREBUILDTHATNEARLYLOSTTHECASE EXAMPLE2 · THENASINTHECUPBOARDANDTHEBACKUPTHATSAVEDIT EXAMPLE3 · THEVIRTUALISEDSERVERANDTHELAYEREDRECONSTRUCTION

Page 3

§ 10 · WHEREITGOESWRONG Common mistakes and technical limitations Common mistakes Technical limitations

§ 11 · INTERROGATORIES & DRAFTING AIDS Questions to ask · Suggested wording Ask your client Ask your opponent Ask your e Discovery / forensic provider SUGGESTED WORDING · INSTRUCTIONFORANARR AY / SERVER RECOVERY

§ 12 · QUICK CONTROL Checklist and red flags · When to involve a digital forensic expert The array / server checklist Red flags When to involve a digital forensic expert

§ 13 · COMMON QUESTIONS Frequently asked questions Can you just image one disk from the server? A disk failed and IT put in a new one and rebuilt the array. Is the evidence gone? The array has lost two disks. Can it be recovered? Do we have to shut the business server down to preserve it? The whole array is huge. Do we really need to image all of it? Is a reconstructed array admissible as evidence?

§ 14 · REFERENCE Glossary Sources and authoritative references DISCLAIMER

§ HOW A SPECIALIST LABORATORY CAN ASSIST Working with Computer Forensics Lab Speak to a forensic examiner, not a salesperson. INSTRUCTTHELAB NEWENQUIRIESEMAILE - DISCOVERY

§ Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Can you just image one disk from the server?
Not use full y, on a striped or parity RAID: a single member holds only interleaved fragments, every file sliced through, and reads as gibberish (§2). The array must be reassembled from forensic images of every member, using the solved geometry (§4). The exception is a mirror (RAID 1), where one member is a readable whole, but even then the array metadata matters for currency.
A disk failed and IT put in a new one and rebuilt the array. Is the evidence gone?
Possibly, and this is the single most damaging thing that can happen (§5, Example 1): a rebuild recalculates and overwrites stripes. Caught early, enough original stripes may survive on forensic images of the members to reconstruct; run to completion, the overwritten data is gone. Stop any rebuild at once, image every member including the failed and replacement disks, and recover on the copies.
The array has lost two disks. Can it be recovered?
It depends on the parity: a single-parity array (RAID 5) survives one failure, not two, so two losses put it beyond reconstruction from the survivors alone (§5). A double-parity array (RAID 6) survives two. Where the array is beyond parity, partial recovery of what the survivors cover is attempted, and the estate, backups, replicas, end point s, carries the rest (Example 2, §8).
Do we have to shut the business server down to preserve it?
Usually not: live server storage is preserved by snapshots and live forensic acquisition that capture the relevant data while the system keeps running (§6), and by targeted, documented collection of the relevant shares rather than wholesale imaging. Downtime is reserved for where the array itself must be imaged member by member, which is planned to minimise disruption.
The whole array is huge. Do we really need to image all of it?
Often not: where it is the documents that matter, targeted collection of the relevant shares, home directories and mailboxes is the proportionate route (§6, guide 20). Full member-by-member reconstruction is reserved for where the array itself is in issue, its deleted data, its structure, or where the file system must be rebuilt. The method is sized to what the dispute actually needs.
Is a reconstructed array admissible as evidence?
Yes, when done properly: the members are imaged and hashed, the reconstruction is validated and its geometry and method documented so it can be explained and reproduced by another examiner (§4). A reconstructed logical volume is as sound as any other image; what must be avoided is the undocumented black-box reassembly that cannot be explained, and the rebuild-in-place that alters the original. cflab. u k · e-disc ove r y. u k ©2026 Computer Forensics Lab Ltd ·cflab.uk ·e-discovery.uk ·info@cflab.uk ·+44 (0)20 7164 6915 Page 16 of 18
§ Related documents
Instruct the practice

Bring us in early. Defensibility is built, not retrofitted.

Whether you are responding to a regulator, preparing for disclosure, or scoping an internal investigation, start the chain of custody with a short, confidential conversation.

WhatsApp